Why Linear Users Need Waymaker Sync

If you're using Linear, you already know it's the best task tracking tool for developers. Clean interface, keyboard shortcuts, fast performance, Git integration. It's perfect for what it does.

But Linear can't solve AI amnesia.

And if you're shipping 50%+ AI-generated code, AI amnesia is costing you 2-4 hours every single day.

What Linear Does (Brilliantly)

Linear is built for team coordination:

• Task tracking and issue management
• Sprint planning and project timelines
• Team workflows and status updates
• Integration with GitHub, Slack, and other tools

Linear solves: "What is everyone working on and what's the status?"

It's fantastic at this. We're not here to compete with Linear. We're here to solve a different problem that Linear was never designed to address.

The Problem Linear Doesn't Solve

AI doesn't remember what's in Linear.

Every morning, you:

1. Open Linear and see your tasks
2. Open Claude Code or Cursor
3. Spend 30-60 minutes explaining context for each task:
   • The architecture decisions made last week
   • The patterns to follow
   • The dependencies with other work
   • The rationale behind the approach

Linear tracks your tasks. But AI has no organizational memory of:

• Why you made certain decisions
• What patterns you've established
• What approaches you've already rejected
• How different pieces of work relate to each other

This is AI amnesia. And it's not Linear's job to fix it.

What Waymaker Sync Does (Differently)

Waymaker Sync gives AI persistent organizational memory through the Trinity Architecture:

One markdown file. Three synchronized views.

1. Your IDE: Markdown files in /docs folder (where AI can read them via MCP)
2. Commander Document: Rich text editor for reading and collaboration
3. Commander Taskboard: Kanban board with metadata and progress tracking

How It Integrates With Linear

You keep using Linear for task tracking. We don't replace it.

Waymaker Sync adds the memory layer that AI needs.

Example workflow:

1. Sprint planning in Linear → Create issues and assign work
2. Development in IDE → Waymaker Sync captures sessions, decisions, patterns
3. AI reads Waymaker Sync → Complete context of architecture, patterns, decisions
4. Task updates → Sync back to Linear via integration

The result:

• Linear tracks what you're working on (tasks, status, assignments)
• Waymaker Sync captures why and how (decisions, patterns, context)
• AI has complete memory across both systems

The Specific Problems Waymaker Sync Solves

1. Session Continuity

Without Waymaker Sync:

• Each AI session starts from scratch
• You manually explain context from Linear tasks
• AI forgets yesterday's decisions

With Waymaker Sync:

• AI reads session briefs automatically
• Complete context restoration in seconds
• AI remembers every decision, forever

2. Pattern Enforcement

Without Waymaker Sync:

• You document patterns somewhere (Notion? Confluence? README?)
• AI doesn't consistently access them
• 30% of suggestions violate your patterns

With Waymaker Sync:

• Patterns live in /docs/patterns/ in your IDE
• AI reads them automatically via MCP
• Pattern compliance is automatic

3. Cross-Tool Coordination

Without Waymaker Sync:

• Cursor doesn't know what Claude decided
• Windsurf has no idea about yesterday's architecture choices
• You're the manual bridge between AI tools

With Waymaker Sync:

• All AI tools read the same organizational memory
• Consistent decisions across Claude, Cursor, Windsurf
• Zero duplication of context briefing

4. Architecture Context

Without Waymaker Sync:

• Linear has task descriptions, but not full context
• You explain architecture decisions repeatedly
• New team members spend weeks learning context

With Waymaker Sync:

• Architecture decisions documented once in /docs/architecture/
• AI reads them automatically
• New team members (and AI) have instant context

Why Not Just Use Linear + Notion?

You could. Many teams do. But:

1. AI doesn't read Notion automatically - You have to copy/paste context manually
2. No sync between IDE and Notion - Double documentation work
3. Notion isn't version controlled - No Git history of documentation changes
4. No MCP integration - AI can't access Notion seamlessly

Waymaker Sync is MCP-native. It lives in your IDE where AI already works. Zero friction.

The Pricing Reality

Let's be honest: We're more expensive than Linear.

Linear pricing:

• Standard: $8/user/month
• Plus: $14/user/month

Waymaker pricing:

• Starter: $29/user/month (50K tokens)
• Professional: $79/user/month (200K tokens)
• Business: $299/user/month (1M tokens)

But we're solving a different problem.

The value proposition:

• Linear saves your team 30 minutes/day in coordination → $40-80/mo value
• Waymaker Sync saves you 2-4 hours/day in AI briefing → $500-1000/mo value

Plus, you're not choosing between Linear and Waymaker. You use both:

• Linear: Team coordination ($8-14/mo)
• Waymaker Sync: AI memory ($29-79/mo)
• Total: $37-93/mo for complete developer productivity stack

And for early adopters:

• EARLYBIRD: 50% off first 3 months
• FROMLINEAR: 30% off for Linear users
• BETA500: Free during beta (limited to 500 users)

What Makes Waymaker Different From Linear

How They Work Together

Best of both worlds:

Linear for:

• Sprint planning
• Issue tracking
• Team assignments
• Status updates
• Manager visibility

Waymaker Sync for:

• Architecture decisions
• Pattern documentation
• Session briefs
• AI organizational memory
• Cross-tool coordination

Commander (coming soon) for:

• Business intelligence
• Cross-project analytics
• Strategic guidance
• Performance tracking

The Bottom-Up Strategy

Linear is typically bought top-down by engineering managers for team coordination.

Waymaker Sync is bottom-up - individual developers adopt it to solve their AI amnesia problem.

The path:

1. You start using Waymaker Sync personally (solve your AI amnesia)
2. Your productivity jumps 25-50%
3. Your teammates notice and adopt it
4. Your manager sees the team-wide value
5. Company adopts both Linear (coordination) + Waymaker (memory)

Real-World Example

Before Waymaker Sync:

8:00 AM - Check Linear, see 3 tasks for today
8:15 AM - Open Cursor, start on first task
8:15 AM - 9:30 AM - Explain to AI:
  - The architecture decisions from last week
  - The patterns we're following
  - The dependencies with other features
  - Why we rejected approach X
9:30 AM - Finally productive, AI writes code
12:00 PM - Lunch
1:00 PM - Open Claude for second task
1:00 PM - 2:15 PM - Re-explain context AGAIN to Claude
2:15 PM - Productive coding time

After Waymaker Sync:

8:00 AM - Check Linear, see 3 tasks for today
8:15 AM - Open Cursor, start on first task
8:15 AM - AI reads Waymaker Sync memory automatically
8:20 AM - Productive immediately (AI already knows context)
12:00 PM - Lunch
1:00 PM - Open Claude for second task
1:05 PM - AI reads Waymaker Sync memory automatically
1:05 PM - Productive immediately

Time saved: 2.5 hours per day.

Join the Beta

If you're using Linear and struggling with AI amnesia, we built Waymaker Sync specifically for you.

Beta launches Q1 2025. Benefits:

• 100% free during beta period
• 30% lifetime discount for Linear users (FROMLINEAR code)
• Direct access to founders
• Shape the Linear integration roadmap

Register for Beta Access →

What's Next

We're building deep integrations with Linear:

• Sync task metadata between Linear and Commander
• Link Waymaker Sync docs to Linear issues
• AI reads Linear context + Waymaker memory together
• Unified view of tasks + documentation

Coming in Q2 2025.

The Bottom Line

Linear is perfect for team coordination. Keep using it.

Waymaker Sync solves AI amnesia. Add it to your stack.

Together, they give you:

• Team visibility (Linear)
• AI organizational memory (Waymaker Sync)
• Zero wasted time briefing AI
• 25-50% productivity increase

Stop wasting 2-4 hours per day on AI amnesia.

Get Early Access →

---

Stuart Leo is a Linear user who built Waymaker Sync to solve his own AI amnesia problem. He loves Linear for task tracking and built Waymaker Sync to complement it, not compete with it.